Content quality control has to be media's not-so-secret weapon
As Barry Adams analyses the cause and effect of mass AI-generated content, it seems to me there is only one clear path to success for publishers.
There’s a neat feature in Glide CMS which lets harassed writers and sub-editors know they’ve gone awry on a headline and lets them know it needs work. (Hold, on this isn't a sales pitch...)
Said feature means you can set business rules for things like SEO, or simply reduce the likelihood a bolshy designer will go looking with malice aforethought for whomever broke their 3-deck headline rule for the umpteenth time.
What makes me think of this?
I was reading Barry Adams’ latest piece on the Content Quality Bell Curve, and pictured a world in which a CMS had a content quality enforcement feature, burning with alerts and refusal-to-save until a required level of information was entered, in the manner of some SEO fulfilment tools. Who'd need editors, huh?
Before the AI KoolAId convinced many that humans are old hat, such an idea was utterly inconceivable, but the train of thought is an intriguing one if only to put into relief the current situation with content production.
As Adams notes in his excellent piece, we are approaching a stage where a substantial part of the internet, even the majority, is starting to be occupied by low quality and AI-generated trash.
Again, as Barry points out, there's always been a good deal of drivel out there, but the volume is increasing at levels only made possible by automation.
The obvious commercial conclusion for those not wishing to participate in such a race to the bottom is to strive for quality in their content.
It's in the details
Shifting from the macro to the micro during this rumination on what quality means in this era, I happened to read a story on my local newspaper's site concerning a defence manufacturing company in our area.
Essentially, it was about the prospects for the business improving as the UK decides it needs to make a few more swords, as well as plowshares, in the current uncertain situation.
To my editorial consternation, there was a not a single mention of what the company actually made for its military customers. It could be planet-devastating death rays, or it could be camouflaged sporks - I still want to know.
One can argue such an omission is a small thing, but it really isn't. Such omissions make the news editor in me twitch quite violently. If you treat those consuming your content as fools, then you are making a fool of yourself.
You don't have to club the reader's attention span into submission with details, yet it remains a core task of reporters to take the complex and render it into terms the lay person can understand.
So when "quality" is spoken of, quality in content is in the details, and if it’s not in the details it won't be present in the whole.
The "Who, When, What, Why and How" of basic news reporting is not some awful stricture that is designed to punish inexperienced reporters; it is the base essence of quality in reporting. Get that right, all else falls into place.
Even amid all the immense distracting babble over what tech can and can't do for our industry, and what it has and hasn't done, some basic editorial requirements remain constant in actual content production.
Such moderate standards of quality such as this are enforceable only within a production chain with humans in it. There is no automated solution, and if there were, it would likely only result in some universal and bland definition of quality, if the results we see from AI-created content are anything to go by.
So then, we come to a chicken and egg situation. Am I a paid subscriber to my local newspaper? No, I am just a registered user. Every time I consume content from there, I ask myself, “Should I be paying for this?”.
The industry insider in me says "yes" of course, but the journalistic quality filter puts a roadblock on that. The price-to-information ratio isn't high enough. Yet unless an organisation has the funds to improve its situation by hiring, then it remains locked in a battle with the awful, ever-growing mass of low quality content.
As Mr Adams puts it, "being a mediocre, forgettable publication is a death sentence."
The ultimate CMS for speed & flexibility, Glide CMS is designed for the high-demands of publishing, media, and sports organisations.
Achieve your audience engagement and growth goals faster with Glide CMS, built with thoughtfully integrated AI and backed by decades of media industry and technology experience.
Create, manage, and deliver content at scale with shorter production times and improved targeting. Get Glide and get going.
GenAI vs content quality
Top publisher SEO (and our friend/solution partner!) Barry Adams of Polemic Digital takes a dive into what generative AI and tech monopolies are doing to content quality. To quote Immortan Joe, it's all getting mediocre - but that creates space for excellence.
Read
AI SEO - a tale of ups and downs
Emina Demiri-Watson of Vixen Digital shares a tale of a client which grew rapidly with AI-powered programmatic SEO, followed by a possibly unrecoverable crash. Check out the dos and don’ts.
Read
The bigger they are
Supersized public broadcasters like the BBC are probably best-poised to use AI in ways which transform how media is created. But they also face the biggest challenges to do so successfully, write David Caswell and Mary Fitzgerald for Prospect Magazine.
Read
The future of Google Search
Google previewed its new AI Mode, and it looks a lot like AI Overviews with even fewer links or onward traffic. SEO tech guru Barry Schwarz shows and discusses the implications for publishers and site owners here.
Watch
The power of news(letters)
A good read on how the team at UK rights and reviews gurus Which? used newsletters to grow its pool of potential subscribers by over a million people, while showcasing a much wider array of content to audiences at the same time. The secret? Great content, to where people want it.
Read
LA Times's AI U-turn
Few major titles use AI to create things without human oversight, for reasons reinforced this week when the LA Times had to disable a new 'anti-bias bot' within a day of launch. The AI bot, "Insight", adds counterpoints to opinion pieces to try and present a wider picture and eliminate supposed bias. The notes, generated by Perplexity without human oversight, create a sort of automated discussion thread beneath articles. As other publishers have decided, while you can generate content without human involvement the inevitable and ultimate bit of human oversight comes when it reaches its readers, rarely shy of making noisy judgement - as they did on a piece about the KKK.
Read
Lawyers rejoice: Musk vs Altman is on
The dispute between Elon Musk and OpenAI is accelerating to the courts after a judge rejected a motion to delay OpenAI's move to becoming a for-profit entity. It means a showdown between the two biggest figures in AI is certain to boost the billing accounts of vast swathes of the US legal system. For observers in media, we'll have our eyes open for any morsels dropped in depositions which might hint at attitudes to purloined IP and pesky things like paying for content.
Read
ICO on patrol
The UK data protection watchdog has launched an investigation into TikTok's handling of children's data, alongside examinations of Reddit's and Imgur's age verification practices, to ensure compliance with data protection laws and the Children's Code.
Read
TikTok frenzy
The list of social media names, tech "experts", influencers, TV stars, and even actual investors with money, all circling the mooted sale of political football TikTok like sharks, gets longer by the minute - all pretending there will be a normal sale process where bids are judged on merits. The China-owned app is under order to sell up or exit the US over concerns about user data. Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian has joined one, The People’s Bid for TikTok, as the clock ticks to an April deadline.
Read
Reviving local news
Our happy story of the week: Newswell, a nonprofit based at Arizona State University, is helping to sustain local news. Led by Executive Director Nicole Carroll, former editor-in-chief of USA Today, the model works by newspapers effectively 'donating' themselves to Newswell, which in turn offers all the backend operational services.
Read
Google tracking
Did you think your phone habits would only start being tracked by Google after you fire up some apps? A recent study by a Trinity College Dublin professor reveals that Google uses advertising cookies, like the DSID cookie created after logging into your Google account, and Google Android IDs to track users on Android devices even when they are not actively using a Google app. Worse still, this all happens without user consent or knowledge. Google has, expectedly, pushed back against the findings.
Read
Eye on excellence
Here's a cheatsheet of 199* projects launched in 2024 by publishers worldwide which have all moved the needle in areas as varied as audience engagement, AI newsroom adoption, attracting young readers, multimedia products, PR, marketing and more. All nominees for the 2025 INMA Global Media Awards. (*OK, some were entered in more than one category, but ain't no-one got time for... etc etc).
Read