Putting the Nick in copyright theft
Britain's most famous ex-party-leader-turned-Meta-exec argues that copyright protections would kill AI growth and innovation. Is he the sort of man people want to generate ideas on how the web works?
Being an avowed glutton for the written word, it's seldom that I gleefully anticipate not reading something. Every single meaningful written word that I have not read, in whatever tongue, is a source of faint regret. Like some corporeal LLM, I'd like to have it all filed away, and unlike an LLM, I'd understand context. An impossible dream of course, but every now and again someone makes my theoretical task a little easier: step forward Sir Nick Clegg.
For those not of a persuasion to follow British politics (and I can't blame you) who are wondering why Sir Nick is the target of such arch and wilful ignorance, then allow me to provide an aide-memoire.
Formerly the leader of a centrist political party, the Liberal Democrats, in 2010 he steered them from their usual third-place national election finish into being key power players in a coalition government – a rarity in the UK with its first-past-the-post electoral system.
Joining the coalition and getting some fingertips near the levers of actual government power came at some cost, however. Notably he was - and still is - seen by many as having traded principle for power by dropping a key election pledge important to a lot of his support in order to enter the corridors of government alongside the Conservative Party.
Thus it was not too much of a surprise when his party were all but wiped out electorally in 2015, although it was somewhat a surprise when he went off to join Facebook in 2018 as vice‑president of global affairs and communications, being eventually promoted to president for global affairs under Meta, prior to leaving at the start of 2025.
Although he rarely gets mentioned in political circles any more for his previous job there – another rare thing in a parliament where the past missteps of previous rivals will be trotted out for decades after – the media and much of the public have not forgotten that he became shorthand for “typical politicians, saying one thing and doing another”.
So why then is he the eye of our particular storm at the moment? Simply because, like many other Big Tech departees before him, he has written a book, and it was during the publicity tour for his soon-to-be-released tome How to Save the Internet that he chose to opine on the Copyright vs AI debate currently alive in our parliament, and opined in such a startlingly predictable way that it cannot pass without at least a measure of contempt from those with publishing in their heart.
The world’s biggest free lunch
To quote The Times: "Making technology companies ask artists’ permission before they scrape copyrighted content will 'basically kill the AI industry in [Britain] overnight,' Sir Nick Clegg has said."
Essentially, Clegg has come down on the side of those who believe artists and creatives should be required to individually "opt out" from having their work be consumed by AI for training, on the opposing viewpoint to those of us who believe that those doing the data harvesting of intellectual property for their own purposes must ask permission to use it before they do so.
There's more from Clegg: "Quite a lot of voices say ‘you can only train on my content, [if you] first ask’. And I have to say that strikes me as somewhat implausible because these systems train on vast amounts of data."
This makes Clegg's primary argument to be that all the data is out there already, and so it makes no sense to place use protections around any of it. Now, I might not have attended Cambridge University like Clegg, but my Hampshire peasant sense tells me that if you want a thing because you're saying it has no value due to its abundance, then it clearly does have a value because you want it.
If these are Clegg's beliefs, then why does he not just place his new book directly into his envisioned free-for-all space, and allow it to be absorbed and regurgitated by voracious LLMs rather than selling it?
Obviously we all live under the shadow of Big Tech tail swiping us into the null traffic void because we refuse to be strong-armed into allowing them free ranging access to the stuff of our very livelihoods, and it seems to me that Clegg is just the temporary here-today-gone-tomorrow acceptable face of that threat, personally enriched as he has been by Meta's dollar geyser.
Clegg was a politician of a managerial ilk, an ilk which is rapidly losing credibility with sizeable parts of the voting publics. I feel much of what it takes to be such a politician revolves around presenting inevitabilities to the people in a digestible way. Yet no such inevitabilities exist. It is the same case here.
By not reading Clegg's book How to Save the Internet then, I will save myself time, because I only need to see the word "regime" once a week, and as for the regulation it undoubtedly will recommend, having those in the pay of Big Tech making the recommendations is about as unpleasant to me as leaving it to scared politicians or a social media vote.
How to actually save the internet seems – according to the US courts at least - to revolve first around breaking up the two major search and social tech monopolies of which Clegg has long been a party, as well as levelling the ad market and enforcing a reasonable measure of copyright by using laws that already exist and are not uncertain.
Then you just leave it alone and let people do the rest, as they did on the internet before the Platform Age and before awfuls such as Clegg had a say in it.
The ultimate CMS for speed & flexibility, Glide CMS is designed for the high-demands of publishing, media, and sports organisations.
Achieve your audience engagement and growth goals faster with Glide CMS, built with thoughtfully integrated AI and backed by decades of media industry and technology experience.
Create, manage, and deliver content at scale with shorter production times and improved targeting. Get Glide and get going.
In the age of AI, search might be making a comeback
Is Search dead and getting buried in the sea of ads, dominated by brands, driven more by budgets than by usefulness? Search Engine Land ponders whether Search is on the brink of extinction or slowly making a comeback as something useful, authentic and valuable.
Read
Hard traffic truths
SEO sorcerer Barry Adams is the go-to man for all things Google News. In assessing the impact of the company's new AI Mode for news, he warns bluntly that "publishers need to focus on audience strategies that exclude Google as a reliable source". It's as simple and as daunting as that.
Read
Texas takes on tech
In a move trumpeted as a win for parental control and child safety, Texas has passed a bill which mandates age verification for app store downloads and purchases. How does this effect you? It means millions of users potentially having to share sensitive personal information to prove who they are, and potentially a whole bunch of new user journeys to think about - such as how a user gets permission from a parent. Expect the app stores to handle most of the work - but we all know this rarely means zero work for those making apps and it will inevitably make app submission more complex.
Read
AI showdown: Reps vs Senate
A US House of Representatives bill to impose a decade-long moratorium on state-level AI regulations resurfaces America's national divide on the best way to govern the rapidly growing sector of technology. The argument of unified federal regs against state-level regs is common across many aspects of US law-making so it is unlikely to be resolved soon. Maybe that is the idea...
Read
Hungry Google versus Hungarian Dolphins
Hungarian publisher Like Company is engaged in the first AI copyright test case in the Court of Justice of the European Union against Google. They claim that Google Gemini, when prompted, produced a summary from an article about dolphins which could only have come from their content. Now the CJEU must rule on whether dolphin-centric content theft has occurred. Read it if only to learn the legal definition of a chatbot!
Read
Meta's day of reckoning looms
The hearing stage of the US antitrust trial against Meta has concluded. Now, Judge James Boasberg must rule on whether Meta's acquisition, as the US Federal Trade Commission claims, of WhatsApp and Instagram in the “personal social networking services” space broke US monopoly laws. If he does decide so, then he'll rule on how the harms should be remedied.
Read
UK creators fight AI copyright plan
Creators say the UK government's approach to AI regulation risks undermining one of the nation's most valuable industries, arguing that allowing AI companies to use copyrighted works without compensation or transparency is giving a green light for intellectual property theft. The logical next question is: if AI cripples the creative industry, which one is next?
Read
Google's AI Mode: gateway into a walled garden
Even though Google insists it will continue to drive traffic to websites outside its platform, its new AI Mode seems more like a fortress designed to keep users inside Google's ecosystem rather than sending them elsewhere. SEO champion Lili Ray shares thoughts.
Read
California slashes local news fund
The recent changes in the state funding for California's pioneering newsroom initiative, followed by Google cutting its own contribution, is yet another blow to local journalism at a time when it's needed most. The original deal was a landmark and very much needed to stop the shrinking of a vital sector of democracy and a lifeline to communities losing access to credible, local reporting.
Read
How The Atlantic cracked the subscriber code
The Atlantic's success story highlights a crucial shift in digital journalism, the focus is now on quality, engagement, and flexible subscription models. Their strategic use of onboarding, dynamic pricing, and diversified content offerings shows how legacy media can thrive in a challenging landscape, and set an example for other publishers who aim to build a sustainable and loyal audience.
Read
BBC History's digital revival
By expanding beyond print and embracing new formats, BBC History has shown how legacy brands can successfully blend tradition with innovation. While balancing quality content and modern consumption habits, History has managed to reach a wider audience while also maintaining their trust and authority. Press Gazette digs deeper.
Read
Google's Ad empire on trial
The dismantling of the Google empire is a historic reset for the entire digital economy, something that goes far beyond regulatory housekeeping. Ricky Sutton discusses what comes next.
Read
The final cut: the decline of film criticism in newsrooms
The decline of traditional journalism has started an avalanche, to no one's surprise, and one of the things that got almost completely buried under the AI slop is film criticism. Richard Roeper chatted with Editor and Publisher about the shift in newsrooms, sustaining cultural journalism despite budget cuts and changing audience habits.
Read